Many
years ago, when I was a naive student and started to create my proper
philosophy, I read one small and thin book written in green letters. This book
influenced me a lot and many times there were ocasions to remember it or quote
it. I’m talking about „T.A.Z.“ (or „The Temporary Autonomous Zone“) by Hakim Bey. My recently anti-system
formed mind was amazed by thoughts that appeared in this short but rich work. I
totaly agreed with all that was written there and I thought, that this anarchistic work
must have a strong impact on some alternative stream of the contemporary
society. However, nobody from my friends, colleagues or teachers knew it. Now it’s been more than twenty (!!) years it was written, so maybe some of you
have gotten to know it (it’s available in online version as well, or you can just inform yourself about the work at wiki).
What
I saw as the most significant thought of this rather essay was (among other striking themes) the concept of
family and family life. Bey literally says that family is cesspit of the society. At the time of the creation of first human
societies, there were just groups – the group was a social unit where lived
various generations of usually more families or just one big family (all of
them were relatives). The group was characteristic for the strong cooperation
and unity of its members. By the modern concept of family the model of groups
was abandoned and this led to alienation among the non-close family members. This
is basically the thought Hakim Bey is presenting us and there’s historically nothing wrong
about that. It was a way of how the things were developping: the group was
usually moving itself from one place to another according to the possibility of
gathering the food and when the first settlements were formed, the model of
co-living changed as well - the family as parents and children started probably
because of the focus basically on bringing up the children, to provide the
children a stable home where they can live and grow up.
But
when the experience was telling the people that this model of a family is
somehow wrong, noone had the idea to return back to the group model (although
some communities live like this nowadays and it really works, e.g. this one). What actually
was that experience which was calling out but noone paid any attention to it?
Simply, just the experience of us all – of the children who had to live under
the reign of parents‘ rules that sooner or later became more or less repugnant.
From what idea do you think Sigmund Freud created his famous theory about
opressed suffering from childhood? I think almost every child has suffered some
time at home from whatever but what’s important – it can be really whatever,
but it depends how the parents treat the issue and if they make the children
feel responsible. Especially young children about 3-5 years are very sensitive
and they can understand every rising up of the parent’s voice as they had done
something wrong and they feel the fault which in fact is not appropriate. But
they don’t understand that yet. And although they even don’t worry about that
at that particular time, the treatment of their parents around this age will
appear in their later behaviour, in the personality as a whole. And that’s why
we sometimes act and react in some strange way and we don’t know why – we have
some unconscious patterns already coded in ourselves. They are unconscious
because we experienced something as very young children and we don’t remember
that or we just don’t think about that until something happens – and this
reminds us what happened to us long time ago. This is what Freud calls (in my words) „putting
something aside“ – we put aside those things that happened to us in childhood just
because our lives go on and we don’t have time to stress ourselves, so we
simply foget that. And when we are facing some extreme situations we usually
act surprisingly even to ourselves.
The
first advice is to get conscious of that, to realize what is happenning and why
it is happenning, because if you don’t realize that, it can lead to many
neuroses that you have just oppresesd in childhood and adolescent age, and that
can come out in stronger way than if you work with them for some time already.
The worst is maybe the fact that you can learn to work with these problems when
you are an adult. When you are a child or a teenager, you can’t cope with your
feelings in any easy way and this reflect significantly in your behaviour. Then
there is very simple for the parents or teachers to judge your personality, to
put you into the box with particular labels. At the parents‘ side it’s usually because they just project their wishes into the children and these wishes
sometimes stay unfulfiled. They blame the child and the child feels bad about
that; the children finally blame themselves too. This never should happen.
And what’s on blame
here (if we are talking about blame, we have to blame someone or something as
well!) is the family itself. This model of small family. Now the parents don’t
have to care about the group interests, but about interests of just themselves
and their children and they are so overfocused that they are creating the environment
where there is not possible to live happily. The modern family parents think
that they make the children happy by buing them some material presents. Now,
the young parents of today are trying
to bring the children up in some kind of respectful ambient, but we will have
to wait some time to the results. In fact many of them are already acting like their parents unconsciously.
So, what I was trying to say from the beggining
is, that the family itself as an institution is the most probable basis for
many mental disorders, neuroses of all types and moreover, the wicked genetic
information.
They know why they sing it’s
all in the family.
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat