When you get thirty, all your female friends of the same age
are engaged, or married, or have children and your male friends of your age
start to speak like your mom. And everything is about one: the children.
I am not suggesting this type of
question have to emerge around this approximated age, but some of us just because
of their particular age indeed have to solve this question: I am thirty, so
let’s have a child because actually I am already too old and all my friends and
family members would treat me like an outsider. This is the worst solution of
your thirtyness I have ever heard but honestly there are many people who think
like this.
So first, we have to define the
problem of having children in general. These thirty-year-old-mature-solutions
are just casual endings of some situations but with the previous long-time
intention of having children. So there’s no wonder (except they are your all
life friends who turn into your parents in a while). But if you reach this
particular age without any wish of own children, it’s the long-time intention
of not having children, and although people are changing and their opinions are
changing with the age as well, there are some themes in which there is
necessary to be consistent from the first moment. And if you have been always
saying that you don’t want to have any own children, there are many reasons for
that attitude. I would like to show the main philosophical reasons why not to
have children in general.
1.
Global reason
This reason is maybe the
most popular or the most known among people who don’t want to have their own
children. It considers the density of world’s population and concludes that
having so many people in the planet and among them so many children who don’t
have parents, that there is almost a moral obligation not to have own children.
They would be another ones who have to be fed by the world and the world is
small enough to feed so many throats right now indeed. If the population
increase more and more, the poorest will allways suffer at the first place.
2.
Genetic reason
The most natural reason for
why to have children of every live being is to keep my genes alive, to leave
here something of mine when I won’t be here anymore. Every being acts like this
– this is one of the keys in natural selection – to maintain my species alive.
It’s authomatical primitive act of perserving the species. In all species it’s
highly welcomed. Except human kind. Behold – humans don’t reproduce themselves
to maintain the human race alive. Today the genetic and authomatical reason was
modified. In fact there remains the authomatical non-conscious process, but
people want to leave here their own particular gene, not the gene of human
race. There’s no wonder – the world is overpopulated so why being afraid of
extintion of human race. The reason is highly egocentric: to leave here
something from myself in particular. Because of this mutation the institution
of having children become strictly conscious egoistic propagation of genes.
3.
Intentional reason
It‘s the continuation of
the genetic reason, because it has much to do with egoism. In this case the
reason for having children considers the intention of leaving my genes here on
the Earth, but before that there is the intention of „I want.“ The very first
intention of having children is the thought of wanting. Of wanting something
that is probably missing in the relationship of the people or wanting simply
justified with genetic reason. There always have to be „I want“ (except when
you don’t plan that, of course). And this „I want“ expresses high egoism per se. People usually don’t consider
pros and cons in case of having children, although they for example consider
pros and cons in case of buying a new sofa. People just want, that’s all, and
everything solves itself.
4.
Social pressure
People who somehow reach
the age for have children and family and don’t behave like they should
according to the society, are psychically persecuted. And this persecution
happens mostly inside the family. The family members (especially mothers) talk
to you as if you were ill or something. The biggest mistake is to listen to
them and finally to fulfil their wishes. This is your life. People shouldn’t be
opressed by family, friends and society just because they decided not to have
children. And this takes double value in case of abortion. If you get pregnant
but have consistent opinion on not having a child, you have the right to act
according to your life philosophy!
5.
Career reason
If you are devoted to
your job or just like your life as it is (without children), it’s good to think
as well, that the children extremely change your personal and professional
life, especially if you’re woman. First, you have to spend some time with them
at home, then you have to care about them even working and stressing situations
are acumulating. Yes, the trends are changing and it could be the man who does
the babysitting, but honestly – having children is not only giving birth and
then doing nothing. It’s to be stressed all your live from now. Human is the
only mammal who needs whole years of care and attention until it stands on it’s
own feet (some people live at their parents‘ house until thirty!). Parenthood
is the full-time job without discussions.
I intentionally named this article „On Why Not To Have Own
Children“ to stress the word „own“, because of course there exists an
alternative in adopting the children if you agree with the global reason, and
the genetic reason in this case don’t have its base. However, the intentional
reason changes its ground, because although there should be wanting, this
wanting is different – it’s rather willingness to help the child without
parents. It’s definitely not the egoistic „I want“. We can also discard the
social pressure reason, because the society always treats your own child in
case of persecuting you of not having it. Nevertheless, if you have adopted
child, the social pressure don’t stop - it just changes its behaviour. But only real problem with having an
adopted child is the last, career reason, because it’s about the fact of having
the invader physically at home and if this is the main reason you don’t want to
have children, there’s no place for adoption anyway. Only the long-distance
adoption. We have news from the child, we know how is he or she being treated,
that he or she is well educated and so on. So if we are economcially prepared
to care about the child, this is the best way to do that!
But the problem is maybe in the social system itself
because in the end it’s cheaper to have your own child because of the help you get
from the system. If you decide to adopt the child at a long distance, you don’t
get anything. But the idea is still much more noble – to help to raise the
child only from your own money. You definitely couldn’t afford this having your
own child.
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat